Spano v. the Boeing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that unlike a class certified under Rule 23(b)(3), class certification under Rule 23(b)(1
• reviewing Spano v. Boeing Co., No. 06-0743-DRH, 2008 WL 4449516 , at (S.D. Ill. Sept. 29, 2008)
• “Nothing we have said should be understood as ruling out the possibility of class treatment for one or more better-defined and more-targeted classes.”
• analyzing the competence of counsel and whether counsel would have a conflict of interest with any class member
• “We are not here to review any or all hypothetical orders that the court might have crafted.”
• “[O]ur task is to review only the class certification orders issued by the district court in these two cases. We are not here to review any or all hypothetical orders that the court might have crafted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).