Rogers v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a failure to monitor claim is “derivative in nature and must be premised” on “an underlying breach of fiduciary duty”
• finding that a failure to monitor claim is “derivative in nature and must be premised” on “an underlying breach of fiduciary duty”
• noting that “several [district] courts have held that a failure to monitor claim is derivative in na‐ ture and must be premised [on] an underlying breach of fidu‐ ciary duty”
• \Several [district] courts have held that a failure to monitor claim is derivative in nature and must be premised [on] an underlying breach of fiduciary duty.\
• “[A] failure to monitor claim is derivative in nature and must be premised [on] an underlying breach of fiduciary duty. Without an underlying breach of fiduciary duty, [the plaintiff’s] claim for failure to monitor fails on its merits.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).