Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the PSLRA does not apply to ERISA claims
• holding that the PSLRA does not apply to ERISA claims
• noting that under LaRue, §§ 1132(a)(2) and 409(a) “may be used by the benefi- ciary of a defined-contribution account that suffers a loss, even though other participants are uninjured by the acts said 16 No. 20-2708 to constitute a breach of fiduciary duty”
• “when breach of fiduciary claims allege that defendants failed to act reasonably in light of adverse circumstances created by the fraudulent activity of others, rather than actually participated in the fraud, Rule 8(a
• \All we hold today is that participants in defined-contribution plans may use [section 1132(a)(2)] . . . to obtain relief if losses to an account are attributable to a pension plan fiduciary's breach of a duty owed to the plan.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-02-22· cited 16×
• Rogers v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-05-03· cited 14×