Skip to main content
· 1/27/2012

Synthia Ross v. Citizens Financial

Citations

  • 667 F.3d 900
  • 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 996
  • 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1121
  • 2012 WL 251927
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Dukes inapplicable and holding that “unlawful policy denying employees earned-overtime compensation ... is the common answer that potentially drives the resolution of this litigation”
  • in wage and hour case, plaintiffs had demonstrated commonality of issue where they submitted declarations from ninety-six potential class members, who together worked at approximately eighty-three percent of the defendant’s Illinois branches
  • scope of class should be “readily discernible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Evans, Clevert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.