Skip to main content
ILND· 9/23/2004

Howell v. Motorola, Inc.

Citations

  • 337 F. Supp. 2d 1079
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2202
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19094
  • 2004 WL 2125373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases finding that allegations that a defendant was a member of a plan’s investment committee is, without more, an insufficient basis for inferring that he should have been privy to certain company information
  • failure to allege whether defendants were company employees or their positions violates Rule 8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pallmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.