Fifth Circuit· 4/29/2020
Heriberto Chavez v. Plan Benefit Services
Citations
- 957 F.3d 542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating a class certification order when, among other things, the court “[did] not identify the common question with any specificity” and “analyze[d] it conclusionally”
- reversing class action where district court responded to “warring factual contentions” concerning putatively common issues with “thin survey” and “unsupported assurance” as explanations for why predominance is satisfied
- reversing a class action where the district court responded to “warring factual contentions” concerning putatively common issues, with a “thin survey” and “unsupported assurance” as explanations for why predominance is satisfied
- “Appellate judges are not finders of fact, and . . . it’s up to the district judge to find the facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mock v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-08-01· cited 34×
- Prantil v. ArkemaFifth Circuit· 2021-01-22· cited 28×
- United Svcs Automobile v. SampsonFifth Circuit· 2023-10-06· cited 18×
- Angell v. GEICO Advantage InsFifth Circuit· 2023-05-12· cited 11×
- Chavez v. Plan Benefit ServicesFifth Circuit· 2023-08-11· cited 4×
- Mosaic Baybrook One, L.P., Mosaic Baybrook Two, L.P., and Mosaic Residential, Inc. v. Tammy CessorTexas Supreme Court· 2023-04-21
- Pentair Residential Filtration, LLC v. Paul Belsome, III D/B/A Belsome H2 InstallersTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-08-30
- Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. Brian Koetter and Elyssa Parven, Individually, and on Behalf of Themselves and for All Others Similarly SituatedTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2024-12-31
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court· 2013-03-27· cited 1,534×
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 1,424×
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,222×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 776×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Frances Unger, William Patterson, Lead Gordon Ellis, Lead v. Amedisys Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2005-02-17· cited 201×
- CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-03-18· cited 175×
- Gene and Gene LLC v. BIOPAY LLCFifth Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 134×
- Spano v. the Boeing Co.Seventh Circuit· 2011-01-21· cited 126×
- M.D. Ex Rel. Stukenberg v. PerryFifth Circuit· 2012-03-23· cited 99×
- Madison Ex Rel. Hebert v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2011-04-04· cited 67×
- Robinson v. Texas Automobile Dealers Ass'nFifth Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 66×
- Richard Tredinnick v. Jackson National LifeFifth Circuit· 2020-03-25· cited 51×
- Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation v. Board of CommissionersFifth Circuit· 2010-12-17· cited 43×
- Nina Flecha v. Medicredit, IncorporatedFifth Circuit· 2020-01-08· cited 42×
- Vizena v. Union Pacific RailroadFifth Circuit· 2004-02-26· cited 34×
- Mildred R. Copeland v. The Greyhound CorporationFifth Circuit· 1964-12-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.