Skip to main content

Nixon v. State

Citations

  • 2 So. 3d 137
  • 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 44
  • 2009 Fla. LEXIS 37
  • 2009 WL 137506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We need not address this claim because the circuit court held that Nixon could not establish his mental retardation under either the clear and convincing evidence standard or the preponderance of the evidence standard.”
  • \We need not address this claim because the circuit court held that Nixon could not establish his mental retardation under either the clear and convincing evidence standard or the preponderance of the evidence standard.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Wells, Pariente, Lewis, Anstead, Canady, Polston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.