Skip to main content

Spann v. State

Citations

  • 985 So. 2d 1059
  • 2008 WL 2608185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel was not deficient when he tried to challenge a witness’ testimony
  • providing that counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to object to a fair comment which is based on the evidence presented during trial
  • providing that counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to object to a fair comment which is based on the evidence presented during trial
  • rejecting capital defendant’s claim that his depression rendered his penalty phase jury waiver invalid where record contained no contemporaneous evidence of depression
  • “Because the prosecutor was making a fair comment based on the evidence presented at 5 trial, counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to object.”
  • “Because the prosecutor was making a fair comment on the evidence presented at trial, counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to object.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.