Skip to main content

Valle v. State

Citations

  • 502 So. 2d 1225
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ujnless it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneous exclusion of evidence did not affect the jury’s recommendation of death, the defendant is entitled to a new jury recommendation on resentencing.”
  • evidence not cumulative when “different in quality and substance” from other evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.