Skip to main content

Reaves v. State

Citations

  • 826 So. 2d 932
  • 2002 WL 1338424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that matters which inhere in the verdict and the jury’s deliberations are not subject to challenge
  • holding that a juror allegedly “attempt[ing] to discuss guilt prematurely” is a matter that inheres in the verdict
  • affirming summary denial of ineffective assistance claims where no challenge for cause would have been successful for named jurors and where claims that follow-up questions would have revealed a basis for cause challenges constituted mere conjecture
  • denying Reaves’s claim that the jury was not composed of a fair cross-section of the community as procedurally barred because that argument should have been raised on direct appeal but was not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.