Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 765 N.E.2d 578
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 261
  • 2002 WL 497339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that we will defer to counsel’s strategic and tactical decisions
  • noting that “judicial 1 To the extent Frye is arguing that he did not have notice of the conditions, he has waived this argument by raising it for the first time on appeal. See Leonard v. State, 80 N.E.3d 878, 884 n.4 (Ind. 2017
  • judicial estoppel has not been successfully applied against the prosecution in a criminal case due to the unique status of the government as a litigant
  • “Isolated mistakes, poor strategy, inexperience, and instances of bad judgment do not necessarily render representation ineffective.”
  • “Isolated mistakes, poor strategy, inexperience, and instances of bad judgment do not necessarily render representation ineffective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.