State v. Towery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a finding of cruelty establishes the F.6 aggravator even without reaching heinousness or depravity
• holding that a finding of cruelty establishes the F.6 aggravator even without reaching heinousness or depravity
• holding that a trial court’s finding of cruelty beyond a reasonable doubt sufficiently establishes the F.6 factor
• requiring, “[a]t a minimum, an offer of proof stating with reasonable specificity what the evidence would have shown”
• requiring, “[a]t a minimum, an offer of proof stating with reasonable specificity what the evidence would have shown”
• rejecting defendant’s challenge to admission of evidence based on untimely disclosure, absent showing of actual prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).