Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 822 N.E.2d 193
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 169
  • 2005 WL 293676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to overcome the strong presumption of adequate legal assistance, a petitioner must offer “strong and convincing evidence” to the contrary
  • holding that an issue is waived when a party fails to provide adequate citation to proper authority
  • holding that a party waives any issue raised on appeal where the party fails to develop a cogent argument
  • holding that an issue is waived when a party fails to provide adequate citation to authority
  • holding that an issue is waived when a party fails to provide adequate citation to authority
  • holding that party waives any issue raised on appeal where the party fails to develop a cogent argument or provide adequate citation to authority and portions of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Kirsch, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.