Gregory Dickens v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice where State produced overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt
• “[t]he post-conviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses”
• “Although the exclusion of the CBLA evidence might have weakened the State’s case, Dickens has not shown that the exclusion of the CBLA evidence, without more, would make it probable that a different result would be produced at retrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).