Wabash Grain, Inc. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Indiana does not recognize equitable tolling as it is defined under federal law but recognizes some form of equitable estoppel
• noting that Indiana does not recognize equitable tolling as it is defined under federal law but recognizes some form of equitable estoppel
• noting that for judicial estoppel to apply the allegations or admissions must have, at least, been acted on by the court in which the pleadings were filed or by the parties claiming the estoppel
• addressing allegedly inconsistent positions taken in state-court case and related federal-court case
• \judicial estoppel prevents a party from asserting a position in a legal proceeding inconsistent with one previously asserted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).