· 12/12/2005
Specht v. State
Citations
- 838 N.E.2d 1081
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2326
- 2005 WL 3358645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because [the defendant] was prosecuted on an accomplice liability theory, the State was required to prove that [the defendant] knowingly or intentionally aided, induced, or caused [the principal] to commit the offenses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vaidik, Sullivan, Friedlander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.