Wade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n exercising discretion as to whether to admit the inflammatory evidence of prior acts, the court should consider whether the State’s need for the similar transaction evidence outweighs the prejudice inherent to the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mangum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-02-24· cited 13×
• Frost v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-31· cited 9×
• Steele v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-11-19· cited 7×
• Evans v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-22· cited 6×
• Newton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-03· cited 6×
• Spann v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-06· cited 6×
• Janasik v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-09· cited 6×
• Conn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-23· cited 5×
• Andre Janasik v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Cawthon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1904-02-12· cited 174×
• Farley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1995-06-30· cited 109×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-04-03· cited 43×
• Cunningham v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-09-26· cited 39×
• Pecina v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-22· cited 31×
• Reese v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-23· cited 19×
• Tam v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-04-02· cited 10×