Skip to main content

Robertson v. State

Citations

  • 829 So. 2d 901
  • 2002 WL 31267817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant's prior threat in 1993 to shoot his ex-wife with an assault rifle was inadmissible at his 1996 trial for killing his girlfriend with a handgun
  • holding that although a trial court may have conducted a legally incorrect analysis when crafting its order, if the court reached the right result, albeit for the wrong reason, the order may nonetheless be affirmed
  • recognizing that Tipsy Coachman doctrine “allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that ‘reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons’ so long as ‘there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record’ ”
  • discussing that an appellate court may affirm a trial court order that reaches the right result, but for the wrong reason
  • noting that appellate court may affirm a trial court order that reaches the right result but for the wrong reason
  • holding that the appellate court could not use the tipsy coachman doctrine to hold that evidence was admissible under the Williams rule when the State never filed the required Williams rule notice and never argued in the trial court that the evidence was admissible on that basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

203 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.