People v. Alvino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bribe receiving by a public official requires evidence of a corrupt agreement
• holding that bribe receiving by a public official requires evidence of a corrupt agreement
• “The general rule is that a party may not introduce extrinsic evidence on a collateral matter solely to impeach credibility.”
• if uncharged crime evidence is probative of legally relevant and material issue, then admissibility turns on discretionary balancing of probative value against potential for prejudice
• if uncharged crime evidence is probative of a legally relevant and material issue, then admissibility turns on discretionary balancing of probative value against potential for prejudice
• “[E]vidence of uncharged crimes may be relevant to show (1) intent, (2) motive, (3) knowledge, (4) common scheme or plan, or (5) identity of the defendant. The list, of course, is not exhaustive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Alvino

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Alvino
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-08-14