Walraven v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the admission of appellant’s confession to incest amounted to nothing more than improper character evidence in his trial for murder
• holding that the admission of appellant’s confession to incest amounted to nothing more than improper character evidence in his trial for murder
• “Character is circumstantial evidence of conduct and state of mind[.]”
• incest not similar to a “bathtub” murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).