Smith v. Amedisys Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “summary judgment was appropriate” where no dispute of material fact existed about the validity of a waiver of claims
• holding that release agreement language “any and all employment related claims” included Title VII claims even if not expressly stated
• holding that evidence of persistent verbal and physical sexual harassment did not reach the threshold of “unendurable” so as to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• holding that there is no individual liability for employees under Title VII.
• holding that there is no individual liability for employees under Title VII
• finding that two months of salary and agreeing to provide favorable work-related references constituted adequate consideration in exchange for a release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).