Copeland v. Wasserstein, Perella & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a claim for negligence is subject to the one-year delictual prescriptive period
• holding that when a lawyer has made the requisite declaration that photocopying costs were necessarily incurred, the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the costs even if they were not itemized
• recognizing that Louisiana’s negligence is subject to the delictual prescription period
• recognizing that Louisiana’s negligence is subject to the delictual prescription period
• “It is well settled that, to conduct our review, we must be able to understand the district court’s disposition of the sanctions motion.”
• remanding for “fuller explication of the court’s ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).