First Circuit· 2/23/2009

Fantini v. Salem State College

Citations

557 F.3d 22
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3508
92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,480
105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 961
2009 WL 428486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that employee did not have good faith, reasonable belief that another employee’s erroneous reporting of certain financial information was an unlawful employment practice under Title VII
holding that there can be no individual liability under Title VII and dismissing claims against individual employee defendants
holding that there is no individual liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and highlighting the similarity between Title VII and the ADEA’s relevant statutory language
holding plaintiff had exhausted sex discrimination claim because, inter alia, she had identified an instance of disparate treatment in an attachment to her EEO complaint
recognizing that “there is no individual employee liability under Title VII.”
stating that “to permit individual liability would improperly expand the remedial scheme crafted by Congress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Dominguez, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

170 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.