Fantini v. Salem State College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee did not have good faith, reasonable belief that another employee’s erroneous reporting of certain financial information was an unlawful employment practice under Title VII
• holding that there can be no individual liability under Title VII and dismissing claims against individual employee defendants
• holding that there is no individual liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and highlighting the similarity between Title VII and the ADEA’s relevant statutory language
• holding plaintiff had exhausted sex discrimination claim because, inter alia, she had identified an instance of disparate treatment in an attachment to her EEO complaint
• recognizing that “there is no individual employee liability under Title VII.”
• stating that “to permit individual liability would improperly expand the remedial scheme crafted by Congress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).