Skip to main content
N.D. Texas· 2/13/2018

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 294 F. Supp. 3d 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress are intentional torts from which the City is immune
  • claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress are intentional torts from which the City is immune
  • “Congress did not abrogate Eleventh Amendment immunity by granting federal courts supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

165 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.