Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/30/1996
Tyler v. State
Citations
- 679 A.2d 1127
- 342 Md. 766
- 1996 Md. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that witness’s detailed hearsay statement was not admissible under the Rule 5-802.1(c) hearsay exception for a prior identification of the defendant because it “consisted of far more than a mere identification of [the defendant]”
- holding that the effect of witness’s refusal to testify was “virtually the same as if [he] had not physically taken the witness stand,” and if he “had not taken the stand, his prior testimony could not be deemed ‘inconsistent’ ”
- “In a civil case, there is no need to protect the defendant’s right of confrontation.”
- “In any event, the inability of Tyler to cross-examine Eiland rules out admissibility under the pre-trial identification hearsay exception. The prior identification exception to the hearsay rule [see Md. Rule 5-802.1(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 49×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-26· cited 38×
- Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-07· cited 32×
- Burke v. HarmanNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-01-06· cited 31×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-10· cited 20×
- Marlin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-30· cited 15×
- Corbett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-01· cited 15×
- Darweshi McRoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-01-15· cited 11×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-10· cited 10×
- Somers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-13· cited 9×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-26· cited 9×
- DULYX v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-21· cited 6×
- Muhammad v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-29· cited 6×
- In re: J.J. and T.S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-28· cited 6×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01· cited 6×
- Alexis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-27· cited 4×
- Lurz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-06
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 2,251×
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-23· cited 78×
- Grandison v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 75×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 70×
- Foster, Evans and Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-03· cited 69×
- Huffington v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 64×
- Ali v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-07· cited 56×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-24· cited 49×
- Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-13· cited 46×
- Ayuda, Inc. v. RenoSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 43×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-01-28· cited 37×
- Barksdale v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-02-13· cited 36×
- Curtis Lee Mayes, Cross-Appellee v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1980-06-03· cited 34×
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-30· cited 33×
- Mouzone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-02· cited 25×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-28· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.