Sclafani v. PC Richard & Son

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, among others, Rasco v. BT Radianz, No. 05 Civ. 7147(BSJ), 2009 WL 690986, at (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2009)
• “For an intentional tort to be considered within the scope of employment, . . . it must in some broad sense further the employer’s business.”
• “In order to establish a retaliatory hostile work environment, a plaintiff must satisfy the same standard that is applied generally to hostile work environment claims regarding the severity of the alleged conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).