Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 9/23/2015

Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.

Citations

  • 138 F. Supp. 3d 329
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136382
  • 2015 WL 5813371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendants’ assertion of vague potential harm insufficient to outweigh the strong presumption of access because much of the information that defendants sought to redact had already been publicly disclosed
  • “The record is devoid of evidence definitely demonstrating that employees similarly situated to Plaintiff are routinely fired for comparable performance deficiencies or that Plaintiff’s conduct contravened a rule customarily leading to immediate termination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torres

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.