Joseph v. Treglia v. Town of Manlius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to promote for discriminatory reasons is \within the core activities encompassed by the term 'adverse actions'\
• concluding that “[t]he temporal proximity between this protected activity in February 1998 and the allegedly adverse employment actions in March 1998[was] sufficient to establish the required causal link for a prima facie case”
• holding that sup- plemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law discrimi- nation claim was proper because it ‘‘[arose] out of approximately the same set of events as his federal retaliation claim’’
• concluding that the district court should have exercised supplemental jurisdiction over NYSHRL discrimination claim because that claim arose “out of approximately the same set of events as [plaintiff’s] federal retaliation claim”
• recognizing discriminatory failure to promote as “within the core activities encompassed by the term ‘adverse actions’”
• noting that Second Circuit courts have found causation with close temporal relationship between protected activity and adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).