Skip to main content
· 2/5/1990

Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.

Citations

  • 569 A.2d 793
  • 117 N.J. 539
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1661
  • 1990 N.J. LEXIS 7
  • 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,001
  • 55 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an “employee can be fired for a false cause or no cause at all. That firing may be unfair, but it is not illegal”
  • explaining that New Jersey Supreme Court has adopted methodology of proof used in Title VII cases for use in LAD cases
  • explaining that New Jersey supreme court has adopted methodology of proof used in Title VII cases for NJLAD cases
  • explaining that New Jersey Supreme Court has adopted methodology of proof used in Title VII cases for use in LAD cases
  • explaining that New Jersey Supreme Court has adopted methodology of proof used in Title VII cases for use in LAD cases
  • stating that qualified privileges exist because “the legitimate public or private interest underlying the publication outweighs the important reputation interests of the individual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.