Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the analysis depends on whether the judicial complaint’s additional allegations “may fairly be considered explanations of the original [administrative] charge and growing out of it”
• union need not be joined where discriminatory effect of collective bargaining agreement is caused solely by employer actions
• preliminary steps of the filing of the EEOC charge and the receipt of the right to sue notification are “essential parts of the statutory plan”
• Reasonable investigations may “includ[e] new acts which occurred during the pendency of proceedings before the Commission.”
• “The additional charges filed during the pendency of the administrative proceedings may fairly be considered explanations of the original charge and growing out of it.”
• “[T]he parameters of the civil action in the district court are defined by the scope of the EEOC investigation which can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).