Skip to main content

Glover v. State

Citations

  • 102 S.W.3d 754
  • 2002 WL 31426388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • narrative of past acts or events, as distinguished from a spontaneous statement, does not qualify as an excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Ross, Cornelius

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.