Skip to main content

De Los Santos v. State

Citations

  • 219 S.W.3d 71
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 10076
  • 2006 WL 3369963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • charge error was not compounded by misstatements by attorneys or trial court; jury \was never told they could return a ‘mix and match' verdict\
  • charge error was not compounded by misstatements by attorneys or trial court; jury “was never told they could return a ‘mix and match’ verdict
  • two references to unanimity in general instructions; when “[r]ead as a whole, the charge correctly instructed the jury that they had to unanimously agree on at least one of the application paragraphs”
  • trial objection to child‟s competency made and issue reviewed on appeal
  • trial objection to child’s competency made and issue reviewed on appeal
  • defendant did not contest that children had been abused but argued he was not the abuser, a defense that “presented the jury with an ‘all or nothing’ decision, i.e., either he was the perpetrator of the sexual assaults or he was not”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marion, Speedlin, Simmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named De Los Santos v. State

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.