Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 189 S.W.3d 347
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2100
  • 2006 WL 669636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of evidence relating to severed offense did not deprive Appellant of her severance right as that evidence was admissible regardless of whether the charges against her were tried together or separately
  • holding that admission of evidence relating to severed offense did not deprive Appellant of her severance right as that evidence was admissible regardless of whether the charges against her were tried together or separately
  • “Extraneous-offense evidence is not inadmissible under Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Gardner, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.