Skip to main content

Medina v. State

Citations

  • 573 So. 2d 293
  • 1990 WL 181853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations of ineffective assistance cannot be used to circumvent the rule that postconviction proceedings cannot serve as a second appeal
  • finding no ineffectiveness for counsel's choice not to present witnesses who would have opened the door for the State to cross-examine them about the defendant's violent past
  • “[I]t is inappropriate to use a different argument to relitigate the same issue.” (citation omitted)
  • rule 3.850 proceedings are not to be used as a second appeal and it is inappropriate to use a different argument when seeking postconviction relief to relitigate issues previously disposed of

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.