Supreme Court of Florida· 10/12/2006
Rutherford v. State
Citations
- 940 So. 2d 1112
- 2006 WL 2884822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a 2006 ABA report was not newly discovered evidence because it was “a compilation of previously available information”
- holding that a 2006 ABA report was not newly discovered evidence because it was “a compilation of previously available information”
- denying a clemency claim because the defendant had a hearing and because clemency is an executive function
- denying a similar clemency claim because the defendant had a clemency proceeding and because clemency is an executive function
- reversing first-degree murder conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct
- reversing first-degree murder conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tompkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-11-07· cited 121×
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-21· cited 71×
- Schwab v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 64×
- Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 55×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 54×
- Ventura v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-29· cited 46×
- Henyard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-10· cited 44×
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-04· cited 44×
- Askari Abdullah Muhammad f/k/a Thomas Knight v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-01-03· cited 42×
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-29· cited 40×
- Marek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-05-08· cited 32×
- Rolling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 29×
- Eddie Wayne Davis v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-07-07· cited 28×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-10-17· cited 28×
- Carroll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-05-15· cited 26×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-09-02· cited 25×
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-01· cited 24×
- Power v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 23×
- & SC16-56 Cary Michael Lambrix v. State of Florida and Cary Michael Lambrix v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-03-09· cited 20×
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-06-27· cited 19×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
- Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 658×
- Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. WoodardSupreme Court· 1998-03-25· cited 357×
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 322×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-03-17· cited 305×
- Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-12· cited 256×
- Arthur D. Rutherford v. James CrosbyEleventh Circuit· 2004-09-21· cited 248×
- Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-12-17· cited 139×
- Lugo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-20· cited 95×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-09-08· cited 94×
- Hodges v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-14· cited 82×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-04-11· cited 70×
- Sullivan v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-30· cited 56×
- Glock v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-05· cited 53×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-16· cited 53×
- Arthur D. Rutherford v. James McDonoughEleventh Circuit· 2006-10-05· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.