Skip to main content

Diaz v. State

Citations

  • 945 So. 2d 1136
  • 2006 WL 3530471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding doctor's letter addressing lethal injection research was not newly discovered evidence because conclusions in letter were based on old data
  • rejecting a claim that ABA Resolution 122A supports the proposition that personality disorders are akin to being mentally retarded
  • “Diaz did have an alternative avenue for challenging the lethal injection procedure in federal court [a federal habeas petition], but did not utilize it.”
  • “[Njeither this Court nor the Supreme Court has recognized mental illness as a per se bar to execution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.