Skip to main content

Ruffin v. State

Citations

  • 906 A.2d 360
  • 394 Md. 355
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a \trial court must closely adhere to the approved pattern instruction on the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt[ ]\
  • observing that the “reasonable doubt standard of proof is an essential component in every criminal proceeding”
  • noting that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights guarantee that a criminal defendant shall only be convicted upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • “[A]s a matter of non-constitutional Maryland criminal law, in every criminal jury trial, the trial court shall instruct the jury utilizing the Maryland Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction on the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt, MPJI-CR 2:02.”
  • “We hold that in every criminal jury trial, the trial court is required to instruct the jury on the presumption of innocence and the reasonable doubt standard of proof which closely adheres to MPJI-Cr 2:02. Deviations in substance will not be tolerated.”
  • collecting cases on the subject

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, C.J., Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene and John C. Eldridge (Retired, Specially Assigned)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.