Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/28/1997
Merzbacher v. State
Citations
- 697 A.2d 432
- 346 Md. 391
- 1997 Md. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the admissibility of evidence is within the “considerable and sound discretion of the trial court”
- stating that the admissibility of evidence is within the \considerable and sound discretion of the trial court\
- noting that the common law rule of \other crimes evidence\ is embodied in Rule 5-404(b)
- noting that the common law rule of “other crimes evidence” is embodied in Rule 5 — 404(b)
- stating that the rationale underlying Rule 5-404 is “to prevent a jury from punishing a defendant for having a ‘criminal propensity’ ”
- reiterating that the rationale for the rule is “to prevent a jury from punishing a defendant for having a ‘criminal propensity’ ” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- John Merzbacher v. Bobby ShearinFourth Circuit· 2013-01-25· cited 123×
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-05· cited 70×
- Ruffin Hotel Corp. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-21· cited 69×
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 56×
- Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-17· cited 53×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 53×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-16· cited 51×
- B. SIFRIT v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-27· cited 50×
- Pantazes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-29· cited 45×
- Fuentes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-07-12· cited 45×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 44×
- State v. PutzNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-06-06· cited 43×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-19· cited 42×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-27· cited 42×
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-11· cited 41×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-14· cited 41×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-21· cited 41×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-08· cited 39×
- Hurst v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-07-31· cited 39×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 1,656×
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,392×
- United States v. Larry W. MastersFourth Circuit· 1980-05-22· cited 343×
- United States v. Grady William PowersFourth Circuit· 1995-07-14· cited 225×
- Ashley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 223×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-12· cited 201×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-07· cited 137×
- Thomas v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 119×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-07· cited 99×
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-20· cited 95×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-01· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.