Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/26/1993
Richmond v. State
Citations
- 623 A.2d 630
- 330 Md. 223
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that imperfect self-defense is inapplicable to the crime of unlawfully and maliciously wounding with intent to disable
- failing to instruct jury that prosecution was required to prove specific intent, “resulted in a guilty verdict that otherwise would not have been rendered”
- taking cognizance of plain error in a jury instruction on malicious wounding with intent to disable that omitted specific intent
- reasonable belief a question for the fact-finder to resolve
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAuliffe, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-15· cited 120×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-18· cited 101×
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-13· cited 92×
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-10· cited 80×
- Garnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 74×
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
- Dishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-21· cited 68×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-06-19· cited 64×
- Purnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-18· cited 59×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-19· cited 58×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 49×
- Jones v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-07· cited 46×
- State v. PagottoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 43×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-23· cited 36×
- Williams v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-21· cited 34×
- Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-30· cited 31×
- Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-14· cited 31×
- Ruffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-31· cited 27×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 712×
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-01-25· cited 362×
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-14· cited 337×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Tichnell v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 261×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- People v. BacigalupoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-12-09· cited 182×
- Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-12-28· cited 155×
- Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-03-20· cited 147×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 140×
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-25· cited 131×
- Shell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-24· cited 125×
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-04· cited 122×
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-10· cited 120×
- Thomas v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 119×
- Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-12-23· cited 117×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-21· cited 109×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.