Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/4/1981
Montgomery v. State
Citations
- 437 A.2d 654
- 292 Md. 84
- 1981 Md. LEXIS 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that jury is entitled to decide the law when there is \a dispute as to the proper interpretation of the law of the crime for which there is a sound basis \
- holding that the trial court erred in telling the jury that its instructions on the law were “advisory” and that the jury “could pay no attention” to them
- holding that jury is entitled to decide the law when there is \a dispute as to the proper interpretation of the law of the crime for which there is a sound basis \ (emphasis in original)
- holding, in light of Stevenson, that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that its instructions on the law were “advisory” and that the jury “could pay no attention” to them
- listing the burden of proof as the first bedrock characteristic “indispensable to the integrity of every criminal trial”
- listing the burden of proof as the first bedrock characteristic \indispensable to the integrity of every criminal trial\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-28· cited 144×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-07· cited 99×
- Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-22· cited 80×
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-08· cited 74×
- Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-02· cited 69×
- Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-01· cited 66×
- Wills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-05· cited 58×
- Barnhard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-09· cited 57×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-09· cited 56×
- Unger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-24· cited 52×
- Medley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-14· cited 48×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-10-07· cited 43×
- State v. PagottoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 43×
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-29· cited 40×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-24· cited 33×
- Newman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-07· cited 30×
- Ruffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-31· cited 27×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-01-21· cited 757×
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-12-17· cited 109×
- Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1889-06-12· cited 71×
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-04· cited 68×
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1875-06-08· cited 58×
- Lansdowne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-29· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.