Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 202 Md. App. 487
  • 32 A.3d 1090
  • 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[p]lain error review generally is not applicable” to an “affirmative waiver of [an] issue”
  • A “meeting of the minds” may be shown “by circumstantial evidence from which an inference of common design may be drawn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graeff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.