Skip to main content

Rubin v. Green

Citations

  • 847 P.2d 1044
  • 4 Cal. 4th 1187
  • 17 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 4338
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2549
  • 1993 Cal. LEXIS 1363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Silberg and other decisions emphasized the “importance of virtually unhindered access to the courts”
  • acknowledging that communications with some relation to an anticipated lawsuit are within the privilege
  • noting the “expansive reach’’ given to the litigation privilege in California courts
  • finding the complaint and subsequent pleadings in the litigation were privileged
  • quoted in Ceh-Tech Comm. v. L.A. Cellular Tel. Co., 20 Cal.4th 163, 180, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 548, 973 P.2d 527 (1999)
  • communications in connection with matters related to a lawsuit are privileged under Cal. Civ. Code § 47(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arabian, Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

177 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rubin v. Green

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.