· 7/18/1996
Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman
Citations
- 47 Cal. App. 4th 777
- 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 830
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5363
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 8672
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 825
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
- holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
- holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
- noting that the litigation privilege “applies to communications preliminary to a proposed judicial proceeding, such as a demand letter from an attorney to a potential adversary”; citing Lerette
- cited with approval in Briggs, 19 Cal.4th at 1115, 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 471, 969 P.2d 564
- letter seeking endorsements for complaint to the State Attorney General found to be a statement made in connection with an official proceeding and covered by the anti-SLAPP statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.