Skip to main content
· 7/18/1996

Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman

Citations

  • 47 Cal. App. 4th 777
  • 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 830
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5363
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 8672
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
  • holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
  • holding that letter to possible co-claimants seeking support for filing of suit was covered by the privilege
  • noting that the litigation privilege “applies to communications preliminary to a proposed judicial proceeding, such as a demand letter from an attorney to a potential adversary”; citing Lerette
  • cited with approval in Briggs, 19 Cal.4th at 1115, 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 471, 969 P.2d 564
  • letter seeking endorsements for complaint to the State Attorney General found to be a statement made in connection with an official proceeding and covered by the anti-SLAPP statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.