Skip to main content
· 9/21/1966

Thornton v. Rhoden

Citations

  • 245 Cal. App. 2d 80
  • 53 Cal. Rptr. 706
  • 23 A.L.R. 3d 1152
  • 1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that giving notice of a deposition can be “process” for purposes of the tort
  • publication of matters revealed during discovery standing alone does not support cause of action for abuse of process
  • “The salutary purpose of the privilege should not be frustrated by putting a new label on the complaint.”
  • “If it is desirable to create an absolute privilege in defamation . . . because we do not want [an attorney or party] to have to be concerned with libel or slander actions . . ., we should not remove one concern and saddle him with another for doing precisely the same thing”
  • “If it is desirable to create an absolute privilege in defamation ... because we do not want [an attorney or party] to have to be concerned with libel or slander actions ..., we should not remove one concern and saddle him with another for doing precisely the same thing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.