· 9/21/1966
Thornton v. Rhoden
Citations
- 245 Cal. App. 2d 80
- 53 Cal. Rptr. 706
- 23 A.L.R. 3d 1152
- 1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that giving notice of a deposition can be “process” for purposes of the tort
- publication of matters revealed during discovery standing alone does not support cause of action for abuse of process
- “The salutary purpose of the privilege should not be frustrated by putting a new label on the complaint.”
- “If it is desirable to create an absolute privilege in defamation . . . because we do not want [an attorney or party] to have to be concerned with libel or slander actions . . ., we should not remove one concern and saddle him with another for doing precisely the same thing”
- “If it is desirable to create an absolute privilege in defamation ... because we do not want [an attorney or party] to have to be concerned with libel or slander actions ..., we should not remove one concern and saddle him with another for doing precisely the same thing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.