· 1/12/1989
Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker
Citations
- 765 P.2d 498
- 47 Cal. 3d 863
- 254 Cal. Rptr. 336
- 1989 Cal. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that in order to establish a prima facie case of malicious prosecution under California law, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, that the prosecuted action was brought without probable cause
- in a civil malicious prosecution suit, probable cause exists if “any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim tenable”
- expert testimony inadmissible on issue of probable cause in malicious prosecution suit where it was alleged that defendants failed to adequately investigate claim before bringing suit
- expert testimony inadmissible on issue of probable cause in malicious prosecution suit where it was alleged that defendants failed to adequately investigate claim before bringing suit
- a claim is tenable if “at least one prior California decision” with, “somewhat comparable” facts suggests available relief
- the court must determine “whether any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim tenable_”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arguelles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.