Skip to main content
· 1/12/1989

Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker

Citations

  • 765 P.2d 498
  • 47 Cal. 3d 863
  • 254 Cal. Rptr. 336
  • 1989 Cal. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in order to establish a prima facie case of malicious prosecution under California law, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, that the prosecuted action was brought without probable cause
  • in a civil malicious prosecution suit, probable cause exists if “any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim tenable”
  • expert testimony inadmissible on issue of probable cause in malicious prosecution suit where it was alleged that defendants failed to adequately investigate claim before bringing suit
  • expert testimony inadmissible on issue of probable cause in malicious prosecution suit where it was alleged that defendants failed to adequately investigate claim before bringing suit
  • a claim is tenable if “at least one prior California decision” with, “somewhat comparable” facts suggests available relief
  • the court must determine “whether any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim tenable_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arguelles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.