Skip to main content

Spivey v. State

Citations

  • 45 So. 3d 51
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13323
  • 2010 WL 3464484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statement “I mean if I am being held and I’m being charged with something I need to be on the phone calling my lawyer” was not an unequivocal request for counsel
  • finding that statement was a conditional request because it was prefaced with the word “if”
  • holding that “I mean if I am being held and I’m being charged with something I need to be on the phone calling my lawyer” was at most a conditional request for counsel and not an unequivocal request requiring termination of interrogation
  • holding that “I mean if I am being held and I’m being charged with something I need to be on the phone calling my lawyer” was at most a conditional request for counsel and not an unequivocal request requiring termination of interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf, Roberts, Wetherell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.