Skip to main content

Chaffin v. State

Citations

  • 121 So. 3d 608
  • 2013 WL 4081082
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting effective Miranda warnings should be read “at a normal cadence” (citing Reed v. State, 96 So.3d 1118, 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012))
  • confirming that the standard to be applied for determining whether a person is justified in using deadly force in self-defense is not a subjective standard as to the defendant’s state of mind, but an objective standard as to a reasonably prudent person’s state of mind
  • applying Perley and holding that fundamental error occurred when the State argued to the jury that it could convict the defendant of one charge of tampering with evidence “based on one of two separate instances of tampering” supported by the evidence presented at trial
  • “The law does not ascribe a subjective standard as to a defendant’s state of mind[ ] but concerns a reasonably prudent person’s state of mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damoorgian, Raag, Singhal, Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.