Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/14/2011
Wilkerson v. State
Citations
- 24 A.3d 703
- 420 Md. 573
- 2011 Md. LEXIS 441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ordering limited remand for circuit court to conduct supplemental hearing and for court to make \appropriate findings\ about issue on which court had made no ruling
- “Regrettably, we are unable on this record to confront head-on the merits of the questions presented in the petition[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 52×
- In Re NICK H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-09-29· cited 17×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-05· cited 13×
- Lindsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-01-02· cited 9×
- Long v. Maryland State Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-28· cited 8×
- Norton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-24· cited 7×
- Quinones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-05· cited 5×
- Makowski v. Mayor and City of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-24· cited 2×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-07-25· cited 2×
- Long v. DPSCSCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-28
- State v. GraftonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-29
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-28
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 537×
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsNinth Circuit· 2006-01-30· cited 222×
- United States v. Johnny Carter, Micheal BearamSecond Circuit· 2007-06-08· cited 134×
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-24· cited 129×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-15· cited 120×
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-03· cited 103×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-17· cited 98×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-10· cited 95×
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-04· cited 90×
- United States v. Carrizales-ToledoTenth Circuit· 2006-07-20· cited 88×
- United States v. Johnny Lee Ollie, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2006-03-31· cited 88×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-08-11· cited 87×
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-09-08· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.