Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/30/2001

Roscoe v. State

Citations

546 S.E.2d 417
345 S.C. 16
2001 S.C. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the PCR court’s order of remand for resentencing where the defendant was sentenced in excess of the maximum penalty
requiring a PCR applicant to demonstrate that but for the erroneous statement from the plea court about the penalty he faced, he would have gone to trial
\[W]e have consistently held a defendant must have a full understanding of the consequences of his plea and of the charges against him . . . .\ (citations omitted)
issues on PCR must be framed as one of ineffective assistance of counsel
“Although we have consistently held a defendant must have a full understanding of the consequences of his plea and of the charges against him, ... the defendant must also demonstrate prejudice to be entitled to relief on PCR.” (internal citations omitted)
to be entitled to relief on PCR, the applicant must demonstrate prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.