Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/3/2002
Frasier v. State
Citations
- 351 S.C. 385
- 570 S.E.2d 172
- 2002 S.C. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plea counsel is deficient if he \actively misinforms\ a defendant about parole eligibility
- stating collateral consequences of a sentence fail to render a plea involuntary
- testimony of counsel’s usual practice sufficient to find it was done in this case
- testimony of counsel's usual practice sufficient to find it was done in this case
- PCR court held evidentiary hearing to determine whether applicant was induced to plead guilty based on counsel’s parole advice prior to plea; PCR court’s decision denying relief because counsel did not give any advice as to parole eligibility affirmed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 29×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-07· cited 21×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 20×
- Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-30· cited 16×
- Griffin v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-02-17· cited 10×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.