Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 513 S.E.2d 100
  • 334 S.C. 248
  • 1999 S.C. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a bond forfeiture is equivalent to a conviction when the legislature so defines it
  • stating “an appellate court will not affirm the decision when it is not supported by any probative evidence”
  • stating “an appellate court will not affirm the decision when it is not supported by any probative evidence”
  • penal statutes should be strictly construed against the State and in favor of the defendant
  • a PCR applicant must show both error and prejudice to obtain relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.