Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/16/1999
Scott v. State
Citations
- 513 S.E.2d 100
- 334 S.C. 248
- 1999 S.C. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a bond forfeiture is equivalent to a conviction when the legislature so defines it
- stating “an appellate court will not affirm the decision when it is not supported by any probative evidence”
- stating “an appellate court will not affirm the decision when it is not supported by any probative evidence”
- penal statutes should be strictly construed against the State and in favor of the defendant
- a PCR applicant must show both error and prejudice to obtain relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
- Humbert v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 34×
- Von Dohlen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-30· cited 29×
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-04· cited 28×
- Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 21×
- Sellers v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-01-04· cited 21×
- Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-30· cited 16×
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-23· cited 16×
- Lorenzen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-11· cited 12×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 10×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-10· cited 6×
- State v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-18· cited 3×
- State v. TothMontana Supreme Court· 2008-12-02· cited 2×
- State v. MuldrowCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-05-22· cited 1×
- Dove v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-22
- Richland County v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-04
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-27· cited 103×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-01-11· cited 79×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 52×
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-03· cited 37×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-06· cited 34×
- McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-18· cited 30×
- State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-01-02· cited 21×
- People v. HarveyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-05-30· cited 20×
- Fetters v. DegnanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-02-16· cited 18×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-28· cited 16×
- Hopkins v. KeithLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-06-22· cited 16×
- Samuel v. MouzonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-10· cited 12×
- Olim v. WE MAYBERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1974-06-25· cited 11×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 10×
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. AusbornSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-07-06· cited 10×
- Pryor v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-01-13· cited 8×
- Bennett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.